"If being there you could capture the photograph or shoot the video...... you could very well save the guy" was the argument given by many of the members of the audience. The incidence that I am referring to, is bleeding to death of the Tamil Nadu Sub Inspector Vitrival on the duty (http://www.ndtv.com/news/india/three_arrested_for_tamil_nadu_cops_death_on_duty.php).
The video footage shows the SI begging for help while the TN government officials just loitering around. The extended video also had some ot
her police officers who don't seem to be bothered with the incident. Also in the video footage, we see that the victim asking for help from the cameraman too, while the cameraman doesn't leave his coverage to help the dying man.
Having listened to this part of the story, we start to form a bias against each of these players in the incident. However, the victim of public outrage were the poor photojournalists. So much so, that there was a full hour show (http://www.ndtv.com/news/videos/video_player.php?id=1194070) on NDTV on this Sunday to discuss the ethics or the code of conduct that was to be followed by these photojournalists.
But the request for the hour would be to listen to certain premises for the sake of argument before we form an opinion.
On the right we see the Pulitzer award wining photograph taken by one of my most favourite photographers of all time, Kevin Carter. We all know this picture very well. What we intend to know is the fate of the girl if the most popular version of Carter just clicking the snap and not helping the girl is true.
Several versions of the story are available for research. One of them says that Kevin waited for 20 mins so that the vulture should fly away. Finally he shot the photograph and shooed away the bird. He was however condemned of not helping the child up to the relief camp.
Other version of the story is given by Carter's fellow photojournalist Joao Silva to a Japanese reporter. According to him, the photograph was taken in such an angle that both, the vulture and the child, would come into the frame. The child was actually left there by the parent, who was busy collecting the food from the relief plane that had landed there. The vulture flew off in sometime.
The most interesting part of this premise is the suicide note left behind by Carter. Some of the lines read
"I am depressed ... without phone ... money for rent ... money for child support ... money for debts ... money!!! ... I am haunted by the vivid memories of killings and corpses and anger and pain ... of starving or wounded children, of trigger-happy madmen, often police, of killer executioners...I have gone to join Ken if I am that lucky."
The next is also a very famous picture from the Vietnam war.
The picture shows the a man being shot at point blank range by Vietnamese General Ngoc Loan. The photographer Eddie Adams won a Pulitzer for this one.
Coming back to the situation in hand, the question we need to ask is
- Could the photojournalist, in any of the above situations, be in a position to Save the victim?
- Is there Sensitivity left in these Photojournalists??
- Or are these photographs or video footages merely for Commercial purposes???
- Who is to be Blamed ????
- Or are we Demonizing the photojournalists for no reason at all?????
Whatever be the opinion, we should always remember that every situation at hand is dynamic and every human being complex. The photojournalist has to balance a lot of situations before taking any action.
The post ends here and we are open to discussions.....
Aastalavista....